The Vietnamese government has taken steps to block access to the encrypted messaging platform Telegram, citing violations of national regulations related to cybersecurity, user data management, and the spread of harmful content.
The Ministry of Information and Communications (MIC) confirmed this week that Telegram is under scrutiny for failing to comply with Vietnamese laws governing foreign digital service providers. Authorities allege that Telegram has not cooperated with requests to localize data, appoint a local representative, or remove content considered illegal under Vietnamese law.
Reasons Behind the Ban
Officials said the platform has been used to facilitate the spread of illegal content, including gambling, fake news, and unlicensed trading activities. “Telegram has not taken sufficient action to monitor and restrict activities that threaten national security and social order,” an MIC spokesperson said.
Vietnam’s 2018 Cybersecurity Law requires foreign internet platforms operating in the country to store user data on local servers and respond to takedown requests. While companies like Facebook and TikTok have previously faced similar pressure, Telegram has reportedly not engaged in any formal dialogue with Vietnamese regulators.
Impact on Users and Businesses
The move has already disrupted access to Telegram for millions of users in Vietnam. Many rely on the app for secure communication, trading groups, and community discussions. Businesses that use Telegram for customer service and group coordination have been particularly affected.
Several users have reported that the app is now inaccessible without the use of VPNs, though no official technical details have been released about the blocking mechanisms used. Telecommunications providers in Vietnam have not publicly commented on their role in restricting access to the service.
Official Statements and International Response
As of now, Telegram has not issued a public statement addressing the ban. Cybersecurity experts note that Telegram’s decentralized infrastructure and encryption model pose unique challenges for compliance with localized regulatory frameworks.
International observers have expressed concern that the move may be part of a broader trend toward digital censorship in Vietnam. Freedom of expression advocates argue that restrictions on communication platforms could stifle dissent and limit public discourse.
However, Vietnamese officials maintain that the action is necessary to uphold national security and prevent misuse of digital tools. “We encourage all service providers to work with authorities and align with Vietnamese law to ensure a safe and healthy online environment,” the MIC stated.
What’s Next?
The ban is expected to be followed by further crackdowns on platforms that do not comply with Vietnam’s digital governance rules. The MIC has recently hinted at plans to enforce stricter penalties on non-compliant tech firms, including fines and service suspensions.
While the future of Telegram’s operations in Vietnam remains uncertain, the case underscores growing tensions between governments and global tech platforms over control, data sovereignty, and user privacy.