A U.S. federal judge has ordered structural changes to Google’s search business in the landmark antitrust case, while leaving the company’s Chrome browser and default search agreements largely intact. The decision marks a pivotal moment in the Justice Department’s efforts to curb Google’s market dominance in online search.

Search Operations Under Scrutiny

The court concluded that Google unfairly maintained its monopoly power in the search engine market. As a remedy, the judge directed the company to alter some of its search-related practices, particularly those that limit competition from smaller rivals. However, the ruling stopped short of enforcing broader measures like breaking up the company’s ad and search units.

Chrome and Default Deals Left Untouched

In a significant win for Google, the court refrained from imposing restrictions on its Chrome browser or the lucrative default search agreements it has with companies like Apple, Samsung, and wireless carriers. These deals, worth billions of dollars annually, have been at the center of the government’s case, which argued that they stifle user choice.

Impact on Tech Industry and Consumers

The ruling signals a mixed outcome: Google will face operational constraints on how it manages search, but its strongest revenue engines remain unaffected. Industry experts say the judgment underscores the difficulty regulators face in balancing antitrust enforcement with technological innovation and consumer convenience.

Google’s Response and Next Steps

Google welcomed the court’s decision to preserve its browser and partnerships, reiterating that its products benefit users and promote competition. Meanwhile, the Justice Department is weighing potential appeals, signaling that the legal fight over Big Tech’s influence is far from over.