California Governor Gavin Newsom has vetoed a bill that sought to restrict minors from accessing AI-driven chatbots, citing concerns over enforcement feasibility and the potential to stifle technological progress. The decision comes amid growing debates in the U.S. over how much exposure children should have to artificial intelligence systems.

Bill Aimed to Protect Children from AI Influence

The proposed legislation, backed by child safety advocates, aimed to limit how minors engage with generative AI platforms such as ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and other AI-powered companions. Lawmakers argued that such systems could influence young users' emotions, behaviors, and beliefs by generating human-like conversations that mimic empathy or friendship.

The bill also required tech companies to implement strict age-verification systems and prevent AI models from collecting data on minors.

Governor’s Veto Cites Overreach and Implementation Challenges

In his veto statement, Governor Newsom said that while protecting children from harmful AI content remains important, the proposed measures “lacked clear enforcement pathways” and could create barriers for educational AI tools used in classrooms.

He also emphasized the need for a balanced approach that supports innovation while ensuring accountability. “We must not react to new technology with fear, but with thoughtful regulation that evolves alongside it,” Newsom noted.

Tech Industry Applauds, Advocates Express Disappointment

Tech companies and digital innovation groups welcomed the veto, saying the bill would have imposed unrealistic compliance burdens on AI developers. Industry representatives argued that many AI tools already include built-in safety filters and parental controls.

However, child rights organizations criticized the decision, calling it a missed opportunity to safeguard vulnerable users from the psychological and social risks associated with AI companionship.

Future of AI Regulation in California

The veto underscores California’s ongoing challenge in defining ethical and regulatory boundaries for AI. Lawmakers have hinted they may reintroduce a revised version of the bill next year, with clearer definitions and feasible enforcement measures.

Experts predict the state will remain at the forefront of AI governance debates, balancing its role as a tech innovation hub with the need to protect its youngest citizens from emerging digital risks.